Reflection refers to thoughtfulness, concentration, meditation, contemplation -- especially the calm, careful, continued consideration of something. Oten it involves observing and coming to understand the functioning of one's own mind or heart (which is sometimes called self-reflexive awareness).

In the context of NCDD we are mainly interested in collective reflection in which people - through dialogue and deliberation - think together about something. They may, in the process, take notice of how they are doing, or of the dynamics of their conversation or their group, often with the help of a facilitator. All this is collective reflection.

Reflection tends to have a calm, thoughtful quality to it. We aren't talking about arguments or deadlines here.

Reflection also has two technical meanings in the field of dialogue and deliberation.

1. Reflection is often short for Reflective Listening or Mirroring in which a listener says back to a speaker what the listener heard - both the explicit and the implicit (subtext) meaning. This helps the speaker feel heard and, once they feel heard, they let down their assertiveness, barriers and aggressiveness and can more easily join in the flow of inquiry and co-creativity. This is a core practice of Active Listening.

2. Reflection also may refer to the internal diversity of a Citizen Panel or Citizen Reflective Council. In this case, the word is directing our attention to the way the diversity of the group's membership reflects'' - embodies, mimics or is similar to - the diversity of the larger population from which those members were drawn. Often people say such a council ''represents'' the diversity of the community and thus is ''representative'' of the community. The problem with this language is that it carries connotations (from our "representative government" system) of the council members being answerable to particular constituencies. Although such answerability is characteristic of elected offices, it is not true of, say, people selected at random for a Citizen Jury. In such a panel, citizen participants should act solely as themselves, not as a conscious representative of other subgroups (farmers, African-Americans, businessmen, etc.). What they think and say may ''reflect'' what others in their group think and say, but they should feel able to change their thinking whenever they want to, without feeling obligated to other members of their demographic category. Without this freedom, dialogue and deliberation have a hard time performing their magic, because the participants don't change or grow beyond prior opinions and frames of reference. Using the term ''reflection'' instead of ''representation thus provides a much more generative framing for citizen dialogue and deliberation.



  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.


If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:

see where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010

The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012





Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.11.7