Public Conversation

+details
Participation level:
  • Low (Information only)
Innovation level:
  • Medium (Some new elements)
Facilitator skill level, and other support required:
    ...

     

    Description

    Public conversation and/or individual discussion are informal consultations that allow you to talk to participants in a direct and personal manner. Informal consultation techniques such as these support more formalised consultation techniques by identifying key issues, attitudes, skills and knowledge.The personal level of discussion of these tools is generally not possible under more formalized consultation approaches and a greater appreciation of project issues can emerge as a consequence. Such informal discussions allow a free-ranging discussion around the issues which may reveal issues or attitudes that would not come to light through more structured surveys which may begin with with a pre-conceived notion of who and what is relevant to the issue.


    As well, public conversations can be facilitated with a view to reducing polarisation on contentious issues. Such conversations have been categorised: Talking with the enemy (Boston Sunday Globe, January 28, 2001) where this technique was used to encourage both leaders who supported and opposed abortion to begin a dialogue with the intention of preventing further violence after the killing of doctors in the United States (see http://www.publicconversations.org for more examples of work done by the Public Conversations Project).


    Environmental issues can also generate fiercely opposed factions which undertake violent or potentially violent actions like driving spikes into trees that are to be cleared. Through engaging the opposing factions in a series of ongoing informal discussions with professional facilitation some understanding of one another's viewpoints can be established, and this can assist a more formal process of consultation by focusing attention on the issues rather than the actions or assumed misdemeanours of the 'other side.'


    Public conversations may involve lay and professional speakers.


    This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox


    Category Practice


     

     

     

    Table of Contents

     

    Help
    • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
    • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
    • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

    To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

     

    If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


    see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

      --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


    The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

    If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

      --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

     

     

     

     

    Wheeled by Wagn v. 1.18.1