Participation level:

  • Low (Information only)

Innovation level:

  • High (Innovative)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • Low (No special skills)

Can be used for:

  • Engage community
  • Discover community issues
  • Develop community capacity
  • Develop action plan
  • Build alliances, consensus
Number of people required to help organize:
  • Medium (2-12 people)
  • Individual


A prioritization matrix produces a community view of the priorities in relation to a community issue or proposal.



A prioritization matrix provides a measurable basis for determining the important issues for a community, for example, what priority they give to foreshore revegetation and/or continuing beachfront development.


 

  • Can assist in defining the most important issues in participation projects with many issues.
  • Provides a democratic and transparent device for determining priorities.
  • Can provide a focus for action.

  • Setting up criteria can be problematic, if the brainstorming process raises a large number of issues.
  • Some issues may not be considered because they are not raised by participants.

 

Organizing Prioritization Matrix

How many people to organize?

Time required:

  • Short (< 6 weeks)

Cost:

  • Low (< AUD$1,000)

//(Sourced from The Guide to Managing for Quality Copyright 1998 MSH and UNICEF)//
  • Conduct a brainstorming session on issues that participants wish to explore in relation to a proposal, plan or community service. Go to the Brainstorming tool to learn how to conduct group brainstorming.
  • Fill out the Prioritization Matrix chart with the group: Issue/Frequency/Importance/Feasibility/Total Points
  • In the first column, write down the issues that were mentioned in the brainstorming session.
  • In the second to fourth columns, define your criteria. Examples of some typical criteria are:
  • Frequency: How frequently does/will this issue affect the participants? Does it occur often or only on rare occasions?
  • Importance: From the point of view of the users, what are the most important issue? Add the issues that the organising agency or group wants to address?
  • Feasibility: How realistic is it that you can find a way to address this issue? Will it be easy or difficult?
  • You can choose other criteria if they better fit the situation you are discussing. For example cost, environmental impact (high to low), number of affected persons can act as criteria; for a more quantitative comparison, you could use cost, amount of time, or other numerical indicators. It is also possible to use number values for each criteria and provide a rank out of 10 for each criteria. Collating total numbers for all criteria against issue can indicate the issues of highest priority.
  • Rank/Vote: Each participant now votes once in each of the boxes.Total all the votes together. The totals help you see clearly how to identify the priorities. (The Guide to Managing for Quality Copyright 1998 MSH and UNICEF).

 

References

 

Description

A Prioritization Matrix is a technique used to achieve consensus within a specific group of participants about an issue. The Matrix helps rank problems or issues (usually generated through brainstorming or other techniques) by a particular criteria that is important to the project, as defined by the participants. This allows participants to clearly see which issues are the most important to work on solving first. Prioritization matrices are used to determine what participants consider to be the most pressing issues. (Adapted from //The Guide to Managing for Quality//)


A prioritization matrix can use whatever resources are available to create a table of issues and boxes for participants to cast their "votes." Tools can include whiteboards, computer databases, or twigs and stones in a field trip setting. The important thing is to list all the issues, to determine the frequency with which problems arise in relation to an issue, the importance the people give to this, and to count the votes to determine what is seen by the majority of people as a priority.


This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox


Category Practice


 

 

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6