Deliberative Opinion Poll

+details
Participation level:
  • Medium (Opinions noted)
Innovation level:
  • Medium (Some new elements)
Facilitator skill level, and other support required:
    ...

     

    Description

    Deliberative Opinion Polls (DOPs) measure informed opinion on an issue. They differ from ordinary opinion polls in that participants are informed via briefing notes and access to experts (these may include politicians) and have time to consider the issue in detail, whereas participants in ordinary opinion polls do not have the opportunity to learn about the issue (and so may know little about it), and have no opportunity to deliberate on it, alone or with others.


    This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox


    Category Practice Check out the Center for Deliberative Democracy at http://cdd.stanford.edu


     

     

     

    Table of Contents

     

    Help
    • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
    • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
    • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

    To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

     

    If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


    see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

      --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


    The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

    If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

      --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

     

     

     

     

    Wheeled by Wagn v. 1.18.1