Participation level:

  • Medium (Opinions noted)

Innovation level:

  • Medium (Some new elements)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)
  • Medium (Computer & other expertise)

Can be used for:

  • Engage community
  • Discover community issues
  • Develop community capacity
  • Communicate an issue


Deliberative Opinion Polls aim to develop well-informed core group representatives, who have been privy to good quality information and who can take this information back to share within the community.



Deliberative Opinion Polls will deliver a report which reflects informed public opinion on an issue or proposal. Such reports may then be distributed to the wider community via the popular media.


 


The DOP uses a random sample of the population so that the results can be extrapolated to the community as a whole. The DOP advises decision makers and the media what the public would think if they had enough time to consider the issue properly.


  • DOPs involve a large number of participants (between 250 and 600), therefore set-up costs are high.
  • Informing the participants normally irequires access to experts in a number of fields of knowledge
  • Speakers need to be organised
  • With so many participants' opinions, managing data is a significant undertaking.
  • Organising and running the event can be time consuming.
  • Organisers need to allow time to select participants, undertake an initial opinion poll, allow two-four days for the deliberation process, and then allow time for another poll, and formulating the report.

 

Organizing Deliberative Opinion Poll

How many people to organize?

  • Large (> 12 people)
  • Medium (2-12 people)

Time required:

  • Long (> 6 months)
  • Medium (6 weeks-6 months)

Cost:

  • High (> AUD$10,000)
  • Medium (AUD$1,000-AUD$10,000)

  • Determine a random sample of the population, so that participants are representative of the wider groups in the community.
  • Conduct baseline survey of opinion.
  • Contact experts and politicians who may be required to inform the participants on specific aspects of the issue.
  • Brief participants and dispatch written information.
  • Give participants 2-4 days to compose questions and engage politicians and experts in plenary discussions.
  • Record views on a particular issue before the poll begins and again at the completion of the poll.
  • Changes in opinion are measured and incorporated into a report.
  • DOPs are often conducted in conjunction with television/media companies.

 

References

 

Description

Deliberative Opinion Polls (DOPs) measure informed opinion on an issue. They differ from ordinary opinion polls in that participants are informed via briefing notes and access to experts (these may include politicians) and have time to consider the issue in detail, whereas participants in ordinary opinion polls do not have the opportunity to learn about the issue (and so may know little about it), and have no opportunity to deliberate on it, alone or with others.


This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox


Category Practice Check out the Center for Deliberative Democracy at http://cdd.stanford.edu


 

 

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6