Participation level:

  • High (Stakeholders participate in decision)

Innovation level:

  • Medium (Some new elements)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)
  • Medium (Computer & other expertise)
  • Low (No special skills)

Can be used for:

  • Engage community
  • Discover community issues
  • Develop community capacity
  • Develop action plan
  • Communicate an issue
  • [[Build Alliances]], [[consensus]]

The objective of a citizen committee is to provide broad-based input into planning and Decision Making from a range of groups and agencies that are affected by a proposal or issue.

The citizen committee may have sufficient ownership of a project or issue to take responsibility for the actions that are needed. Where the citizen committee's role is more in a consultation and planning mode, the final plans will be based on better information and deal with a wider range of issues as a result of this broad-based and extensive consultation mechanism.


  • Allows the involvement and input of a range of people (for example, fishers and surfers as well as relevant government departments).
  • Allows development of consensus (where achievable) or directions for action on complex issues that affect the broad community.
  • Effectively disseminates detailed information and decisions to members of the organisations or community sectors represented on the committee.
  • Provides opportunities for exploring alternative strategies and building on commonalities and alliances.
  • Provides for a detailed analysis of project issues, timelines and deliverables and a focus on the outcomes.
  • Participants gain an understanding of other perspectives leading toward an agreed, integrated outcome.

  • Participant selection is a major consideration:
  • The range of interests must be broad enough to represent all those affected, and those with relevant interests and skills.
  • Community members must be willing to work together on a common challenge, and
  • Organisers must be aware of potential conflicts.
  • The original terms of reference need to be agreed upfront and recorded.
  • Contact should be maintained with the committee to ensure that it does not take on a life of its own.
  • Members' comments to the media may not coincide with the sponsor's policy. A set of principles can be developed to avoid this happening.
  • The general public may not embrace committee recommendations.
  • Members may not achieve consensus (although consensus may not be the goal).
  • The sponsoring agency or agencies must accept the need to give and take.
  • May be time and labour intensive if the issue is significant.


Organizing Citizen Committee

How many people to organize?

  • Large (> 12 people)
  • Medium (2-12 people)

Time required:

  • Medium (6 weeks-6 months)
  • Short (< 6 weeks)


  • High (> AUD$10,000)

  • Consider the demographic profile of the community to ensure most of those groups that will be affected by an issue or proposal are represented (see the case study at the bottom of Stakeholder Analysis).
  • Consider special interest groups.
  • Consider groups most affected by the issue.
  • Conduct stakeholder analysis prior to inviting groups to propose representatives (see the case study at the bottom of Stakeholder Analysis).
  • Be flexible to allow other representatives to join if they make themselves known during the participation process (however, it is more effective not to allow alternative representatives, as they can highjack the agenda and/or may need extra briefings that slow down the process).
  • Clearly state the role of the citizen committee and the objectives of the participation.
  • The organising group or agency should work closely with the committee during its formation.
  • The organising group or agency should work closely with the group during the participation process.
  • Use third party facilitators to manage conflict.
  • Be forthcoming with information.
  • Use a consistently credible process.
  • Set up reporting arrangements to ensure that members communicate with their constituents via their regular communications networks, e.g. newsletters, meetings, presentations, email, or websites.
  • Record decisions and keep a running summary. This is important if new people join the group.





Sometimes referred to as Public Advisory Committee or Public Liaison Committee. A Citizen Committee is a group of representatives from a physical or interest-based community, appointed to provide comments and advice on an issue. Generally, relevant community groups and agencies are invited to nominate as members of the committee, although people with specific skills may also be asked. Members meet regularly to provide ongoing input and advice over the duration of the project. (Ontario Public Consultation Guide, page 26) These generally have an agreed life span and are normally organised at the local level to address a specific issue.

This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox

Category Practice




This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.






All cards

all cards


  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.


If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:

see where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010

The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012





Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6