Participation level:

  • Low (Information only)

Innovation level:

  • Low (Traditional)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)

Can be used for:

  • Engage community
  • Develop community capacity
  • Build alliances, consensus
Number of people required to help organize:
  • Medium (2-12 people)


Samoan Circles are similar to Fish Bowl's. They aim to stimulate active participation by all parties interested in or affected by an issue, and allow insights into different perspectives on an issue.



All present at a Samoan circle hear the range of opinions and ideas expressed, and are therefore better informed on the issue, and the aspects of the issue that are under debate. Those who do not speak still have the chance to hear whether someone else expresses their views, and the chance to speak out if someone in the inner circle steps out and allows them to take their place.


 

  • Works best with controversial issues.
  • Can avoid severe polarization.
  • Allows a large number of people to be involved in discussing a controversial issue.

  • Dialogues can stall or become monopolized.
  • Observers may become frustrated with their passive role.

 

Organizing Samoan Circle

How many people to organize?

Time required:

  • Medium (6 weeks-6 months)

Cost:

  • Low (< AUD$1,000)

  • Set room up with centre table surrounded by concentric circles of chairs.
  • Arrange roving microphones.
  • Select one or two representatives for each of the views present to constitute the core of the Samoan Circle.
  • Seat these people in a semi-circle surrounded by two-four open chairs.
  • Clarify that once the discussion begins, the facilitator may withdraw and watch as a silent observer or facilitate the discussion.
  • Before the discussion begins, arrange for the facilitator to announce the rules and ask for agreement from all:
  • people in the larger group can listen, but there is no talking, booing, hissing or clapping.
  • anyone from the larger group who wishes to join the conversation may do so by coming forward at any time and taking one of the 'open chairs' on either end of the semi-circle.
  • Indicate that the discussion may begin with a brief statement from each representative and then proceeds as a conversation. Representatives discuss issues with each other as the larger group listens.
  • Record viewpoints expressed and commonalities identified, and agreements or outcomes reached.

 

References

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6