Participation level:

  • Medium (Opinions noted)

Innovation level:

  • Medium (Some new elements)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)

Can be used for:

  • Build alliances, consensus


Role plays help people see other viewpoints, and the range of different perspectives that may affect decisions and planning in relation to natural resources. To develop team-building as people see how different roles are necessary in the total natural resource management perspective.



Role plays provide greater awareness of other people's roles in a group, or in relation to an issue or proposal, and the relevance or importance of these roles.


 

  • Participants can take risk-free positions and view situations from other perspectives.
  • Great as an ice-breaker.
  • Leads to greater understanding of issues.
  • Can be a fun activity that encourages team building within the participation program.
  • Good for scoping the extent of conflicts.

  • People may have little appreciation of other's positions.
  • Can insult unless treated in a lighthearted manner.
  • Participants often require encouragement to take on another's role.
  • Requires clear direction that the role-playing is now over, and ensure that everyone knows that they are now speaking for themselves alone, or confusion can ensue. Having badges or costumes that are taken off at the end of the role-play can help this process.
  • Needs a skilled facilitator with experience of role playing and debriefing.

 

Organizing Roleplaying

How many people to organize?

  • Large (> 12 people)
  • Medium (2-12 people)

Time required:

  • Short (< 6 weeks)

Cost:

  • Medium (AUD$1,000-AUD$10,000)

  • Determine all the agencies or individuals that are likely to influence a particular issue (e.g. commercial organisations, government agencies, non-government organisations, community 'personalities'), and develop badges, lists or costumes to develop a number of roles to make for interesting interactions.
  • Assign roles. Generally, greatest success occurs when people opposed to one another take on each other's roles, thus allowing them to put themselves into the other person's position. (This works best when there is some visual indicator or the role being played, e.g. a cap or badge).
  • Describe a scenario that introduces the issue in a non-threatening way. This technique can cause conflict when used for a contentious issue, so ensure that trained facilitators are available to defuse any confrontations and address the conflict in more constructive ways.
  • Treat the activity as a lighthearted exercise and encourage participation by indicating the lack of consequence from the activity.
  • The person playing the role may be advised by someone with experience in the role they are playing (for example, a resident who is playing a natural resource manager may be advised by someone experienced in management in that area). Role plays are then adlibbed, based on the understanding of the activities/attitudes of the person whose role they are taking.
  • Facilitate the role play to maximize understanding of other's positions. Hence, ask participants why they take a position, or express a certain opinion, while in role.
  • Follow up the activity with a debriefing session that seeks to clarify the variety of potential positions as a precurser to the actual participation process.
  • Make clear the point at which the role play is over: Allow people to say any last things 'in role', then make it clear that when they return to their own seat they return to being themselves.

 

References

 

Description

Roleplaying is an activity where participants take on designated roles and act out characters according to predetermined situations, followed by an evaluation of the activity. People may choose from a range of set roles, for example, local council environment planner, environmentalist, surfrider, developer, natural resource manager and Chamber of Commerce member. By getting people to take on a role that may be unfamiliar to them, this process enhances understanding of the issue from another perspective. However, role-playing requires skilled facilitation, and everyone must be 'de-briefed' and clearly directed to step out of role and return to their own persona before leaving the exercise, or confusion can ensue.


Highly useful as an ice breaker, to get people talking and interacting with one another about the issue, and also to gain some empathy for the position of other stakeholders.


Role playing can involve risks. A person must try to understand another's point of view to the extent that they can act in ways that are appropriate and recognisable.


This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox


Category Practice


 

 

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6