Participation level:

  • Low (Information only)

Innovation level:

  • Low (Traditional)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • Low (No special skills)

Can be used for:

  • Engage community
  • Discover community issues

Questionnaires and response sheets are a measure of community opinion and/or issues at a certain time or in a certain area.


Questionnaires and response sheets provide information on which to base decisions about planning and management of community and/or natural resources.


 


Questionnaires offer the following advantages:
  • Less personal than interviewing, their anonymity can encourage more honest answers.
  • Works well to reach respondents who are widely scattered, or live considerable distances away.
  • Provides information from those unlikely to attend meetings and workshops.
  • Permits expansion of the mail list.
  • Can be used for statistical validation.
  • Allows results to be extrapolated by subgroups.
  • Allows the respondent to fill out at a convenient time.
  • More economical and less labour intensive than interviews and telephone surveys as they provide larger samples for lower total costs.

  • Generally only useful for qualitative data.
  • Low response rates can bias the results. Can involve follow up telephone calls and letters to encourage returns.
  • Needs a return envelope/freepost address to encourage participation.
  • Depends on a high degree of literacy.
  • Wording of questions needs to be unambiguous to avoid bias, and should be pre-tested on a sample audience to ensure that you receive the information you desire.

 

Organizing Questionnaire

How many people to organize?

  • Medium (2-12 people)
  • Individual

Time required:

  • Short (< 6 weeks)

Cost:

  • Low (< AUD$1,000)

  • Draft questions. Keep as short as possible.
  • Trial questions with a small sample (pilot group) to determine whether they are unbiased, straightforward and not open to misinterpretation.
  • Indicate the purpose of the questionnaire at outset
  • Include qualitative data such as age, sex, address, education etc. to allow for further extrapolation of the results.
  • Include any new names/addresses in the mailing list.
  • Send out with printed information materials.
  • If the budget allows, provide free mail reply (stamped addressed envelope; freepost mailbox, etcetera) to improve responses.
  • Document responses as part of the public involvement process.

 

References

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6