Participation level:

  • High (Stakeholders participate in decision)

Innovation level:

  • High (Innovative)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)

Can be used for:

  • Engage community
  • Develop community capacity
  • Develop action plan
  • Communicate an issue
  • Build alliances, consensus


Nominal Group technique aims to increase participation in problem identification, problem solving and program planning, and to make sure that participants represent a balance of the range of opinions available within a community or group.



Nominal Group technique facilitates creative problem solving and delivers group decisions that incorporate individual judgments with greater accuracy.


 

  • Highly effective workshop activity
  • Ensures input from all participants
  • Elicits a wide range of responses
  • Useful for determining democratically derived outcomes
  • Useful for fact-finding, idea generation, or solutions.

  • Good facilitators are required.
  • Rules need to be clear at outset.
  • The wording of questions must be unambiguous and clear.
  • Not for routine business, bargaining, predetermined outcome, or groups requiring consensus.
  • Can be difficult to convince people to use Nominal Groups for the first time.
  • Explanations help to overcome this resistance, but a successful experience helps much more.
  • Trying out the process on an issue that can be covered completely in one
  • early experiences using Nominal Groups, people find it difficult to keep from discussing issues before all points are listed, clarified, and prioritised. So, the facilitator must prevent discussion from starting too soon.

 

Organizing Nominal Group

How many people to organize?

  • Large (> 12 people)
  • Medium (2-12 people)

Time required:

  • Medium (6 weeks-6 months)

Cost:

  • Medium (AUD$1,000-AUD$10,000)

  • Advertise group meeting of 3 to 4 hours.
  • Select participants to ensure a mix of interests/community groups/social levels/age/gender, etcetera.
  • Hire facilitator skilled in nominal group meeting process. Success of the process depends on thorough preparation by the facilitator.
  • Leaders should clarify the questions to be asked, considering what key information they need. Pretest the question before the meeting. Remember, global questions stimulate global answers. Emotional (likes/dislikes, etc.) information must be asked for directly.
  • For larger groups, organise into subgroups (seven to nine people) on the same or different topics, depending on the range of issues.
  • The facilitator should follow the full step-by-step process, which can include the silent generation and balloting of ideas used strategically in a wide variety of situations and taking relatively little time, eg, for quick agenda setting.
  • Choose from the following steps, and follow the process (see: http://128.143.238.20/services/CSA/nominal.htm for detailed instructions):
  • Silent generation of ideas in writing (10 - 20 minutes)
  • Recorded round-robin listing of ideas on chart (20 - 40 minutes).
  • A very brief discussion and clarification of each idea on the chart (20 - 40 minutes).
  • Preliminary vote on priorities: silent, independent (10 minutes).
  • Meeting break
  • Discussion of the preliminary vote (20-40 minutes).
  • Final vote on priorities: silent independent (10 minutes).
  • Listing and agreement on prioritized items.

 

References

 

Description

"Nominal group technique is a process in which a group of people become a group in name only. This technique aims to eliminate social and psychological dynamics of group behavior which can inhibit individual creativity and participation in group decisions. Everyone is given a structured opportunity to participate. Nominal group technique is a way of organizing a meeting to enhance its productivity. Its purpose is to balance and increase participation, to use different processes for different phases of creative problem solving and to reduce the errors in aggregating individual judgments into group decisions. It is especially useful for problem identification, problem solving and program planning." (Source: http://128.143.238.20/services/CSA/nominal.htm)


This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox


Category Practice


 

 

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6