Participation level:

  • Medium (Opinions noted)

Innovation level:

  • High (Innovative)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)

Can be used for:

  • Showcase product, plan, policy
  • Engage community
  • Discover community issues
  • Develop community capacity
  • Communicate an issue
Number of people required to help organize:
  • Large (> 12 people)
  • Medium (2-12 people)


Interactive TV aims to use television as a medium for voting on issues, expressing opinions, and knowing that these votes and opinions will be recorded and distributed to the larger community. This provides an audiovisual element to the voice of industry, government and community groups.



Interactive TV will enable people to vote on almost everything via their television, which, as a familiar 'tool', increases the chances of more people taking up this option. As a result, a larger range of people may express opinions about, or influence decisions about, community issues and proposals, including some sections of the community who may not otherwise have participated.


 

  • Useful for reaching a wide audience.
  • Useful when an issue is very important to the majority of the community.
  • Useful when a large sample of the population's opinion is required.
  • Citizen TV may become more available, accessible and familiar than e-democracy internet options.
  • Allows TV viewers to share their opinions, needs and ideas.
  • Can be useful for education campaigns (e.g. health campaigns).
  • Can combine with web and on-line chat rooms to allow community ideas to exchange ideas in real time.

  • The technology is highly expensive.
  • Can limit the number of detailed responses.
  • Can be difficult to present issues in an unbiased manner.
  • May be attractive to certain sectors of the community and not others.
  • Can develop a rich and diverse online community, but may baffle the non-expert users, and so limit inclusiveness.

 

Organizing Interactive Television

How many people to organize?

Time required:

  • Medium (6 weeks-6 months)
  • Short (< 6 weeks)

Cost:

  • High (> AUD$10,000)

  • Still in the developmental stages, interactive TV is often used commercially for viewer voting on programs and products, but the technology also makes it possible for citizens to be actively involved in voting and commenting on community issues.
  • Requires provision of interactive TV, not for sports or shopping, but for local organisations and the public to participate in 'their' community local interactive TV.
  • Can involve the use of qwerty-handsets within people's living rooms, or phoning or emailing into the station on a particular topic.
  • Viewers can then suggest topics, interviewees, and other directions that the community interactive TV might explore.

 

References

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6