Participation level:

  • Medium (Opinions noted)
  • Low (Information only)

Innovation level:

  • Medium (Some new elements)

Facilitator skill level, and other support required:

  • High (Specialist skills)
  • Medium (Computer & other expertise)

Can be used for:

  • Showcase product, plan, policy
  • Engage community
  • Communicate an issue


Field trips aim to let people to 'see for themselves' the place where a development is proposed to be placed, or to have a demonstration of a technique, for example, water quality testing, in the environment where the technique can be tried, and where it is most able to be seen, remembered, and understood.



Field trips provide people with an understanding about a place and/or practice that allows them to incorporate a new method into their practice, or to provide informed opinions on a proposal or issue.


 

  • Used when the issue being considered has a geographic focus
  • Used when a large number of stakeholders are involved in the process
  • Used where participants require information or education and these are best provided or explained on-site
  • Used when a demonstration will be more effective than presentations
  • Adds transparency and education to the process of participation
  • Provides opportunity for rapport with key stakeholders
  • Creates greater public knowledge of issues and processes

  • Costly if a large number of experts are engaged to present on site.
  • Larger number of participants require large number of staff/facilitators
  • Number of participants is limited by logistics.
  • Potentially attractive to protesters.

 

Organizing Field Trip

How many people to organize?

  • Large (> 12 people)
  • Medium (2-12 people)
  • Individual

Time required:

  • Long (> 6 months)
  • Medium (6 weeks-6 months)

Cost:

  • Medium (AUD$1,000-AUD$10,000)
  • Low (< AUD$1,000)

  • Publicise the field trip
  • Select times that suit the largest number of participants (e.g. select from after hours for full-time workers, daytime for retirees or parents with small children).
  • Field trips can run from several hours to full days to allow the greatest number of participants to attend (depending on the time participants can spare; distance to be traveled; availability of expertise and/or case studies).
  • Advertise the agenda and times of key presentations in appropriate place, e.g. local media; posters at local stores and libraries. This will allow participants to attend for shorter periods if necessary, and will allow them to choose sessions of interest.
  • Ensure adequate staff on site to provide assistance (e.g. give directions; be available for first-aid; organise food and drink (catering, set-up and clean away), etcetera.
  • Create and display signs that publicise the location of field trip through attachment of maps/directions with a pre-posted agenda.
  • Ensure all publicity (signs, media releases, brochures) provide directions from major routes near the site.
  • Allow time for participants to approach experts for one-to- one discussions.
  • Provide printed public information materials during the field trip for interested participants.
  • Appoint staff to act as note takers during the discussions.
  • Provide feedback forms/survey/response sheets to facilitate public input.
  • Pay attention to duty of care/safety issues. If site is difficult to access or contains elements of risk, make necessary preparations to avoid accidents with an emphasis on participants with disabilities.
  • Organise catering if appropriate
  • Ensure toilets are available

 

References

 

Description

Field trips are organised trips where participants visit physical sites. They are a venue for providing information and at times, opportunities for participant input. Public input is possible when other participative activities are combined with the field trip. A popular technique for environmental, planning and design related participation processes, field trips are especially useful as a complement to conference presentations, or when written work such as reports are inappropriate.


This page originally copied with permission from the Citizens Science Toolbox


Category Practice


 

 

 

This is a living story of the Process Arts, including many particular Process. Anyone can browse; if you'd like to edit things, or add a process, you may request an account.

 

Processes

 

Users

 

All cards

all cards

 

  • You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
  • To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
  • When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

 

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:


see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

  --Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010


The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

  --Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

 

 

 

 

Wheeled by Wagn v. 0.15.6