Citizen Jury+Method

Select a broadly representative group of approximately 8-12 people (see Case Study of Citizen Jury with 20 jurors).
Determine a question important to the issue being considered or develop a series of options for the jury to consider.
Brief jurors on the rules of the proceedings, and allow them between two and four days to come to a recommendation.
Provide expert witnesses to brief the jury who can be cross-examined and who can spend time discussing the issue with the jury.
Engage independent moderator(s) to assist the process of deliberation.
At the agreed time, arrange a presentation from the panel and/or collect the jury's report, which should outline their recommendations.
Publish the report and recommendations (this would normally be done by the commissioning body).
If the recommendations of the citizen jury are not followed up, publish the reasons for not following up (this would normally be done by the commissioning body).

You can open and close cards in place. Just click on ~1383/3259.png or the card name.
To get to the page (and web address) for a card, click on ~1709/3792.png.
When you're editing, to create links within the website (even to a card that doesn't yet exist), put double square brackets around some text, like this.

To learn more see the Wagn documentation.

If you have questions, contact the Process Arts wiki support team. We may also be online live, or you can just ask your question here and someone will answer it shortly:

see http://p2pfoundation.net/Category:Facilitation where we are also listing similar practices

--Michel Bauwens (Not signed in).....Sun Jan 31 00:53:33 -0800 2010

The Bohm Dialogue, especially Collective Reflection has significance for me in terms of artistic critique and dialogue.

If one wanted to connect this to Jungian thought I'd relate to that.

--Srule Brachman (Not signed in).....Mon May 21 17:09:16 +0000 2012

Processes

Users

All cards

Table of Contents

Processes

Users

All cards

Help

Main Menu